“Bring Back Flogging” Response Paper Essay

In Jeff Jacobys essay, Bring Back Flogging, he strongly reveals his opinions and beliefs on corporal punishment. Jacoby illustrates the give of communicatory irony and sarcasm. He applies verbal irony and sarcasm in such a way that by variation what is written is easily understood to take what he really means. Jacoby describes what beating is, how it was accommodating, and argues that flagellation needs to be brought back to our society. afterward reading Jacobys argument for bring back the harsh beating and whipping, called flog, I find out that flogging would be helpful if it is brought back.Flogging is exercising the practice of stern beatings and whippings. Flogging has been full by the Puritans in 1632, all the way to 1972 when it was repealed. The Puritans acted in flogging when offenders were sentenced for giftting a crime, such as adultery or blaspheme. When convicted of the crime an individual collapseted, they were level(p) to a post in public, with no sh irt, and unvoicedly flogged. By practicing flogging, and displaying the beating to the citizens of the town, the citizens could see what would be done for their punishment if they commit the same or different crime.If flogging were to be brought back and routinely practiced on offenders of certain crimes, and the beating was displayed to the public, it could greatly reduce crimes committed. Being whipped is not some(prenominal) more or little debasing that macrocosm locked in a cage, alike(p) an animal. Bringing back flogging would enliven possible criminals not to commit a crime that they could be planning. By being whipped in public, the offender depart be highly embarrassed and have severe pain. Hopefully this felling of embarrassment and the pain undergo will stay with them, if they mobilize of committing some other crime. Also, after beaten the wounds will telephone number to scars, these would serve as a steadfast reminders of the consequences obtained from their actions.Prisons are packed tightly with hundreds of criminals. any(prenominal) prisoners are violent offenders and others are not. Providing meals, twist new jails,keeping a prison running, and providing prisoners with necessities, is very expensive. If flogging was the consequence of committing crimes, the cash spent in and for prisons, could be use for other and more important items, such as books for school systems. In addition, less heavy offenders will not be abused or raped in prison. The practice of flogging would too ontogenesis prison space for more dangerous offenders.Bringing back the punishment of flogging would greatly reduce crimes committed. Also, the public display, pain, and the ageless reminder from scars, will reduce the opening night of participating in the crime again. It would also serve as a tangible image to others of what will happen if they commit a crime. Puritan forefathers had an excellent psyche of punishment for committing crimes. Flogging w as also a very effective punishment. The knowledge of what will happen if a crime is committed, and astute how painful it is, will allow individuals to think thoroughly if they ever decide they fatality to commit a crime. I right to vote to bring back flogging